![]() ![]() Each attempt will be made in this duration / max-retries interval. This address must be reachable after traversing the tunnel.ĭuration (in seconds) within which to reach the destination. The IP or hostname where traffic is sent. I'm currently testing the third party router for IPsec access which works fine and the RV220W behind it for VLAN, DHCP, WLAN etc.Tunnel-monitor-nat-network 10.128.128.0/28Īllows you to switch tunnel monitoring on and off for a remote. I cannot put an IOS router in any office, I need a solutions which allows the small offices to usw SMB stuff and the main offices IOS, but all must be compatible to IPsec standard. The seperation from my side of view to IOS should be the throughput, this should seperate SMB from IOS. I understand the promotion of the IOS Series, but that is far away from Small Business and other vendors do have SMB Product in the same pricing range which fully support IPsec, I have got one yesterday, I just need to edit a simple config file by vi and it works with all clients, pricing is the same as the RV220W, but the routing and VLAN features are missing. Hopefully there will be a firmware update to get the router uptodate, IPsec is the standard, PPTP is no longer accepted to be secure and all devices iPad, iPhone, Android Phone, Tablet, PC, Mac do support the standard IPsec without any installs. I like this router and its rich featuresets, VLAN taggins and Intervlanrouting, but if the device is not capable to handle all sorts of standard IPsec clients it is useless for me. Marketing tells it will do IPsec also the online device emulator cleary states "Standard IPsec (XAuth)" My understandig from the product marketing was it will fully supports IPsec but I was wrong. It is nice that someone at Cisco makes politics and cuts off router features to promote the bigger IOS products, but then marketing should clearly show these limitations that IPsec will only work with QuickVPN and compatible clients like IPSecuritas and this router is not compatible to standard IPsec implementations with Preshared Key and XAuth even these options and functionality are described in the admin guide and device emulator ! ![]() Tom, thanks a lot, IPSecuritas works fine with the Mac, but I don't want to be limited to Mac only, iPad and iPhone BYOD is coming soon, also Win8 will be rolled out and only standard IPsec implementations will be allowed or access via SSL-VPN client, not SSL-VPN web / webclient / webinstall due to ActiveX / Java limitations and the needed drive access. 01:55:50: ERROR: Local configuration for 2.206.0.67 does not have mode config 01:55:50: INFO: Received attribute type "ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST" from 2.206.0.67 01:55:50: INFO: Login succeeded for user "Testuser" 01:55:50: INFO: NAT detected: Peer is behind a NAT device 01:55:50: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for x.x.x.x 01:55:49: INFO: Received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY 01:55:49: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt 01:55:49: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02 01:55:49: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID 01:55:49: INFO: Beginning Aggressive mode. 01:55:49: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: x.x.x.x2.206.0.67 ![]() 01:55:49: INFO: Remote configuration for identifier "" found I have 3 other locations where the config on my Mac works fine, but VPN router is not Cisco. Client is Mac with Mac VPN Cisco IPSec, I have also tried NCP Secure Client. I have Setup IPSec according to the RV220W Admin Guide. What must be changed or where is my fault ? I need help, I am currently evaluating RV220W for VPN usage but I'm stuck with the config somehow, it seems there is a problem with Mode-Config ?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |